Table of Contents
April 4, 2025
|
12m

Conti Ransomware Group


A digital skull formed from lines of code with glowing “ERROR” messages in its eyes represents a critical system failure or ransomware threat.

Conti ransomware emerged as one of the most prolific and destructive cybercrime operations in recent history. Operating primarily as a Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) model, Conti and its affiliates inflicted significant damage across numerous sectors worldwide, extorting hundreds of millions of dollars. Known for its aggressive tactics, double extortion methods, and high-profile targets, understanding Conti's operations is crucial for security professionals seeking to defend against the persistent threat of ransomware. This article provides a technical deep dive into the Conti syndicate, covering its origins, evolution, tactics, targets, and essential defense strategies. While the core Conti brand dissolved in mid-2022, the actors, techniques, and malware legacy continue to pose a threat, making this analysis relevant for ongoing cybersecurity efforts.

Origins & Evolution

Conti ransomware was first observed in late 2019 and gained significant traction throughout 2020. It is widely believed to be operated by the Russia-based cybercrime group known as Wizard Spider, the same threat actor behind the infamous TrickBot botnet and Ryuk ransomware. Security firms like CrowdStrike have stated that Wizard Spider ran both Conti and Ryuk operations concurrently, suggesting Conti is an evolution or successor to Ryuk, sharing significant code overlap and operational infrastructure. Initially delivered via TrickBot, Conti later shifted its delivery mechanisms, often relying on BazarLoader (also linked to Wizard Spider) for initial access as TrickBot detections improved.

Conti quickly evolved into a sophisticated RaaS operation. However, unlike typical RaaS models where affiliates earn a percentage of the ransom, Conti reportedly paid its deployers fixed wages, operating more like a structured organization with a core team managing malware development, infrastructure, and negotiations, while affiliates focused on intrusion and deployment. This structure included roles like managers (e.g., alias "Mango"), developers, testers, negotiators, and HR/recruiters.

The group's trajectory took a sharp turn in February 2022. Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Conti's leadership publicly declared support for the Russian government. This controversial stance backfired severely. Shortly after, a Ukrainian security researcher, purportedly an insider or with insider access, began leaking vast amounts of internal Conti data under the handle "@ContiLeaks." This included over 60,000 internal chat messages, source code for the ransomware and other tools, and operational details. The leaks exposed the group's inner workings, hierarchy, payment structures, victim targeting, and even internal conflicts.

The combination of the damaging leaks, public backlash against their pro-Russia stance (hindering ransom payments), and increased law enforcement pressure (including a $10 million reward offer from the US State Department for information on leaders) led to the apparent dissolution of the Conti brand around May 2022. However, security experts widely believe that Wizard Spider did not cease operations but rather dispersed its members and resources into smaller, potentially rebranded ransomware operations (like Karakurt, BlackBasta, BlackByte) or other cybercrime activities, carrying forward the tools and expertise developed under the Conti umbrella. Recent news indicates that ransomware payments drop 35% in 2024.

Tactics & Techniques

Conti employed a multi-stage attack methodology characteristic of sophisticated ransomware operations, leveraging a mix of custom and off-the-shelf tools. Their Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) demonstrate adaptability and a focus on maximizing impact and profit. Understanding the MITRE ATT&CK framework is crucial for identifying these patterns.

1. Initial Access: Conti affiliates gained entry through various vectors:

  • Spearphishing: Highly targeted emails with malicious attachments (e.g., Word documents with embedded scripts) or links, often dropping initial access malware like TrickBot, BazarLoader, or IcedID.

  • Exploiting Vulnerabilities: Targeting known vulnerabilities in internet-facing systems like VPNs, RDP, or web applications (e.g., FortiGate SSL VPN flaws, Microsoft Exchange Server flaws - ProxyShell, PrintNightmare CVE-2021-34527, Zerologon CVE-2020-1472). CISA warns of active exploitation and understanding vulnerability assessments is key to prevention.

  • Stolen Credentials: Using compromised Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) or VPN credentials, often purchased from Initial Access Brokers (IABs).

  • Malware Distribution Networks: Leveraging existing botnets like Emotet or ZLoader for distribution.

2. Persistence & Lateral Movement: Once inside, the attackers focused on escalating privileges and spreading across the network:

  • Command and Control (C2): Establishing C2 channels using frameworks like Cobalt Strike or custom backdoors (e.g., BazarBackdoor). They often used numerous, victim-specific C2 servers.

  • Credential Harvesting: Employing tools like Mimikatz or Windows Sysinternals (e.g., ProcDump) to steal credentials, including domain administrator accounts. Kerberos attacks were also observed.

  • Discovery: Mapping the network using native Windows tools, Active Directory queries, and network scanning tools (like Router Scan) to identify valuable systems, domain controllers, file shares, and backups.

  • Lateral Movement: Spreading through the network using stolen credentials via RDP, PsExec, or exploiting SMB vulnerabilities (like EternalBlue remnants) to deploy Cobalt Strike beacons or the ransomware payload itself.

3. Defense Evasion: Conti actively attempted to disable security measures:

  • Antivirus Evasion: Using custom packers or crypters (like the one developed by indicted member Maksim Galochkin) to obfuscate malware and bypass AV detection. Terminating AV processes and disabling real-time monitoring features like Windows Defender.

  • Deleting Backups: Using scripts or built-in Windows utilities (vssadmin.exe) to delete Volume Shadow Copies, hindering system recovery.

  • Terminating Services: Stopping services related to databases, security software, and backups using Windows Restart Manager or taskkill commands to ensure files are not locked during encryption.

4. Data Exfiltration & Impact: Conti popularized the "double extortion" model:

  • Data Theft: Before encryption, attackers exfiltrated large volumes of sensitive data using tools like rclone or MegaSync to cloud storage controlled by Conti.

  • Encryption: Deployed the Conti ransomware payload, which used a fast implementation of AES-256 (later switching to ChaCha for potentially better speed/evasion) with RSA for key protection. It utilized multiple CPU threads (up to 32) for rapid encryption of files on local drives and accessible network shares (SMB). It typically appended a .CONTI or similar extension and dropped ransom notes (readme.txt or CONTI_README.txt) in directories. Files critical to system operation (like .exe, .dll, .sys) were often excluded to keep the system usable for ransom negotiation.

  • Extortion: Threatened to publish the stolen data on their "Conti News" leak site if the ransom was not paid, adding pressure beyond the decryption key demand. They were known for aggressive negotiation tactics and sometimes leaked data even after partial payment or during negotiations.

MITRE ATT&CK Techniques (Observed):

Tactic
Technique ID
Technique Name
Initial Access
T1566
Phishing
T1190
Exploit Public-Facing Application
T1078
Valid Accounts
Execution
T1059.001
Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell
T1059.003
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell
T1204.002
User Execution: Malicious File
Persistence
T1547.001
Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys
T1053.005
Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task
Privilege Escalation
T1078
Valid Accounts
T1548.002
Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass UAC
T1484.002
Domain Policy Modification: Group Policy Modification
Defense Evasion
T1027
Obfuscated Files or Information
T1070.004
Indicator Removal on Host: File Deletion
T1489
Service Stop
T1490
Inhibit System Recovery
T1562.001
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools
Credential Access
T1003
OS Credential Dumping (e.g., Mimikatz)
T1555
Credentials from Password Stores
Discovery
T1083
File and Directory Discovery
T1135
Network Share Discovery
T1057
Process Discovery
T1016
System Network Configuration Discovery
T1049
System Network Connections Discovery
T1482
Domain Trust Discovery
Lateral Movement
T1021.001
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol
T1021.002
Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares
T1570
Lateral Tool Transfer
Collection
T1119
Automated Collection
T1560
Archive Collected Data
Command and Control
T1071.001
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (HTTP/S)
T1105
Ingress Tool Transfer (e.g., Cobalt Strike)
Exfiltration
T1041
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel
T1567.002
Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage
Impact
T1486
Data Encrypted for Impact
T1490
Inhibit System Recovery
T1491.001
Defacement: Internal Defacement

Targets or Victimology

Conti's primary motivation was financial gain, demonstrated by ransom demands often reaching millions or tens of millions of dollars. They exhibited a degree of ruthlessness uncommon even among ransomware groups, targeting organizations where downtime could have severe, even life-threatening consequences. Keeping up with cybersecurity in the age of IoT is also important as these devices become attack vectors.

  • Target Industries: While opportunistic, Conti showed a propensity for targeting:

    • Healthcare: Hospitals, health systems (e.g., Ireland's HSE, Scripps Health), emergency services.

    • Government: National and local government agencies (e.g., Costa Rican government), law enforcement, municipalities.

    • Manufacturing: Disrupting production lines and supply chains.

    • Critical Infrastructure: Including energy, transportation, and telecommunications.

    • Other sectors: Finance, Insurance, Retail, Education, Legal firms.

  • Target Regions: Conti operated globally but had a significant focus on organizations in North America (especially the United States, which saw over 40% of attacks) and Western Europe. They generally avoided targeting entities within the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), a common practice among Russia-based cybercrime groups.

  • Impact: Beyond data encryption and theft, Conti attacks caused widespread operational disruption, significant financial losses (ransom payments, recovery costs, lost revenue), reputational damage, and in the case of healthcare and government targets, disruption of critical public services. The trend of healthcare data breaches has surged, impacting millions of patient records.

Notable Attack Campaigns

Conti was responsible for numerous high-impact attacks between 2020 and 2022. Some of the most notable include:

  • Ireland's Health Service Executive (HSE) (May 2021): A devastating attack that crippled Ireland's national healthcare IT systems for weeks, forcing widespread cancellations of appointments and diagnostics. Conti demanded a $20 million ransom but later provided a decryptor for free (though the disruption was already immense), possibly due to public backlash. Data was still exfiltrated.

  • Costa Rican Government (April-May 2022): A series of attacks targeting multiple government ministries (Finance, Labor, Social Security, etc.), causing significant disruption to foreign trade, tax systems, and government services. The newly inaugurated President declared a national emergency. Conti demanded $10 million, later raising it to $20 million. This attack occurred shortly before the group's dissolution.

  • JVCKenwood (September 2021): The electronics giant was attacked, with Conti demanding a $7 million ransom and later leaking data after negotiations reportedly failed.

  • Scripps Health (May 2021): A major healthcare provider in Southern California suffered a significant outage affecting patient care systems, electronic health records, and scheduling. The attack cost Scripps Health nearly $113 million. Several Conti members were later indicted in connection with this attack.

  • Nordic Choice Hotels (December 2021): Major hotel chain in Scandinavia hit, impacting booking systems.

  • Various Local Governments & School Districts (US): Conti frequently targeted smaller public entities often perceived as having weaker security postures.

Defenses

Defending against threats like Conti requires a multi-layered, defense-in-depth strategy focusing on prevention, detection, and response. While Conti itself is defunct, the TTPs are still widely used by its successors and other groups. A key component is understanding security logging and monitoring.

Prevention:

  • Patch Management: Aggressively patch known vulnerabilities, especially those in internet-facing systems (VPNs, RDP, Exchange) frequently exploited by ransomware groups (e.g., ProxyShell, PrintNightmare, Zerologon). A solid patch management strategy is essential.

  • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Enforce MFA on all remote access points (VPN, RDP), cloud services, and critical internal accounts, especially administrative ones.

  • Security Awareness Training: Educate users to recognize and report phishing attempts, suspicious links, and malicious attachments. Conduct regular phishing simulations.

  • Network Segmentation: Segment networks to limit lateral movement. Isolate critical systems and control traffic flow between segments.

  • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure users and service accounts only have the permissions necessary for their roles. Restrict administrative privileges tightly.

  • Email Security: Implement robust email filtering solutions to block spam, phishing emails, and malicious attachments. Knowing the different types of phishing attacks helps in creating effective training.

  • Disable Unnecessary Services: Harden endpoints by disabling unused ports and services like RDP if not essential, or limiting RDP access via firewalls and jump boxes.

Detection:

  • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR/XDR): Deploy advanced EDR/XDR solutions capable of detecting malicious behaviors (e.g., credential dumping, lateral movement, suspicious script execution) associated with ransomware TTPs, not just known signatures. Monitor for tools like Cobalt Strike, Mimikatz, PsExec, and rclone.

  • Network Monitoring: Monitor network traffic for anomalies, C2 communications, large data transfers (exfiltration), and unusual SMB activity. Use Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDPS).

  • Log Management & SIEM: Centralize logging from endpoints, servers, firewalls, and applications. Use a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system to correlate events and detect suspicious patterns. Monitor for Active Directory changes and credential abuse.

  • Threat Intelligence: Stay informed about current ransomware TTPs, IOCs (Indicators of Compromise like malicious IPs/domains, file hashes), and threat actor activities through threat intelligence feeds and security advisories (e.g., CISA alerts).

Response & Recovery:

  • Incident Response Plan (IRP): Develop, maintain, and regularly test a comprehensive IRP specifically addressing ransomware scenarios. Ensure roles and responsibilities are clear.

  • Backups: Implement a robust backup strategy (e.g., 3-2-1 rule). Ensure backups are immutable, stored offline or air-gapped, and tested regularly for recoverability. Protect backup infrastructure itself from compromise.

  • Isolation: Have procedures to quickly isolate infected systems from the network to prevent further spread.

  • Containment & Eradication: Follow the IRP to contain the infection, identify the scope, eradicate the malware, and restore systems safely.

  • Consult Experts: Engage with cybersecurity incident response professionals and legal counsel. Consult law enforcement before considering any ransom payment (which is generally discouraged and does not guarantee data recovery or non-disclosure). Having a proper cyber incident response plan is extremely vital.

Conclusion

Conti ransomware carved a destructive path through the digital landscape, exemplifying the potential impact of organized, well-resourced cybercrime syndicates. Operating as a sophisticated RaaS with unique operational characteristics, Conti targeted critical infrastructure and extorted vast sums through aggressive double extortion tactics. While the group's public-facing brand dissolved in 2022 following internal leaks and geopolitical missteps, its legacy persists. The experienced actors behind Conti are believed to have dispersed into new or existing ransomware operations, continuing to leverage the TTPs and malware refined under the Conti banner. Therefore, understanding Conti's rise, methods, and fall remains essential for security professionals aiming to build resilient defenses against the ever-evolving ransomware threat. Continuous vigilance, robust security controls, and proactive threat hunting are paramount.

Found this article interesting? Keep visit thesecmaster.com, and our social media page on FacebookLinkedInTwitterTelegramTumblrMedium, and Instagram and subscribe to receive tips like this. 

You may also like these articles:

• DDoS From Mirai Botnet

• LockBit 3.0 Ransomware

• BlackCat (ALPHV)

• Cyberattacks Target Ukraine

• Black Basta Ransomware

Arun KL

Arun KL is a cybersecurity professional with 15+ years of experience in IT infrastructure, cloud security, vulnerability management, Penetration Testing, security operations, and incident response. He is adept at designing and implementing robust security solutions to safeguard systems and data. Arun holds multiple industry certifications including CCNA, CCNA Security, RHCE, CEH, and AWS Security.

Recently added

Threats

View All

Learn More About Cyber Security Security & Technology

“Knowledge Arsenal: Empowering Your Security Journey through Continuous Learning”

Cybersecurity All-in-One For Dummies - 1st Edition

"Cybersecurity All-in-One For Dummies" offers a comprehensive guide to securing personal and business digital assets from cyber threats, with actionable insights from industry experts.

Tools

Featured

View All

Learn Something New with Free Email subscription

Subscribe

Subscribe