The ransomware landscape is a dynamic and dangerous environment, constantly evolving as threat actors refine their tools, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). Among the significant players in this ecosystem is the Grief Ransomware Group, also known as PayOrGrief. Emerging in May 2021, Grief quickly gained notoriety for its aggressive tactics and its strong operational similarities to the infamous DoppelPaymer ransomware family. Believed to be a direct rebrand or successor, Grief employs double-extortion strategies, encrypting victim data while simultaneously exfiltrating it and threatening public release to coerce ransom payments. This group targets a wide range of sectors globally, causing significant operational disruption and financial damage. Understanding Grief's origins, modus operandi, and targeting patterns is crucial for security professionals seeking to defend their organizations against this potent threat.
Grief ransomware surfaced shortly after the significant decline in activity from the DoppelPaymer ransomware group around May 2021. This timing coincided with increased international law enforcement scrutiny on ransomware operations following high-profile attacks like the one on Colonial Pipeline (attributed to DarkSide, another group potentially linked to the same ecosystem). Security researchers quickly identified striking similarities between Grief and DoppelPaymer, leading to the widely accepted conclusion that Grief is a deliberate rebrand or continuation of the DoppelPaymer operation.
DoppelPaymer itself has roots tracing back to the BitPaymer ransomware, which appeared around 2017. DoppelPaymer gained infamy for targeting critical infrastructure, including healthcare, emergency services, and education. Furthermore, DoppelPaymer is widely believed by cybersecurity firms and government agencies to be operated by or affiliated with Evil Corp, a prolific Russian cybercriminal group led by Maksim Yakubets. Evil Corp has been sanctioned by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, adding legal complexity and risk for victims considering ransom payments to groups linked to them, like Grief.
The transition from DoppelPaymer to Grief involved more than just a name change. While maintaining the core codebase and operational structure, Grief introduced subtle but significant technical modifications. These included changes in the encryption process (specifically, the RC4 key length used for string encryption increased from 40 to 48 bytes) and a shift from demanding Bitcoin (BTC) to Monero (XMR) for ransom payments, likely an attempt to hinder tracking and recovery efforts by law enforcement. The group also updated its leak site, though the underlying structure remained nearly identical to DoppelPaymer's. This rebranding strategy allowed the operators to continue their activities under a new banner, potentially evading some signature-based detection tools and distancing themselves from the notoriety and sanctions associated with DoppelPaymer and Evil Corp. There is ongoing speculation, particularly given the suspected Russian origins of the parent groups, about potential, albeit unproven, links or tacit approval from state actors, challenging the narrative that such groups are purely financially motivated. Understanding the importance of proactive threat intelligence is crucial in such scenarios.
Grief ransomware employs a sophisticated multi-stage attack methodology, often leveraging precursors like Dridex and Cobalt Strike, and relying heavily on "Living off the Land" techniques to blend in and evade detection. Their operations focus on maximizing impact through data encryption and exfiltration (double extortion).
Initial Access:
Phishing: Targeted spear-phishing emails containing malicious attachments or links are a common entry vector. These emails might lead to the download of encoded text files or other loaders that execute initial commands.
Exploiting Vulnerabilities: Leveraging unpatched vulnerabilities in public-facing applications or systems.
RDP Compromise: Brute-forcing or using stolen credentials to gain access via Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). Understanding brute force attacks is essential for securing RDP.
Precursor Malware: Grief intrusions are frequently observed in environments already compromised by the Dridex banking trojan. Dridex often serves as the initial access vector, establishing a foothold.
Execution & Persistence:
Dridex Activity: Dridex often uses DLL Search Order Hijacking (T1574.001), relocating legitimate system binaries (like msinfo32.exe
, dialer.exe
) to non-standard paths (e.g., %APPDATA%
) and loading malicious DLLs masquerading as legitimate ones (e.g., mfc42u.dll
, version.dll
).
Cobalt Strike Deployment: Following a Dridex infection, attackers often deploy Cobalt Strike beacons for enhanced command and control, lateral movement, and privilege escalation. Cobalt Strike frequently uses Process Injection (T1055) into legitimate processes like svchost.exe
, often resulting in these processes running without command-line arguments.
Grief Execution: The Grief ransomware payload itself is often executed via rundll32.exe
loading a malicious DLL (using DllRegisterServer
).
Persistence Mechanisms:
Grief modifies the ImagePath
registry value of a legitimate Windows Service (T1543.003) to point to the ransomware executable, ensuring it runs upon the next system boot, often in Safe Mode. Understanding the Windows Registry structure is crucial for identifying such modifications.
It modifies LegalNoticeCaption
and LegalNoticeText
registry keys (T1112) to display the ransom note during logon.
Uses bcdedit.exe
to configure the system to boot into Safe Mode with networking disabled and to disable Windows recovery options (bcdedit /set {default} recoveryenabled No
).
Privilege Escalation & Lateral Movement:
Operators use tools like Cobalt Strike and native Windows utilities (LOLBins) to escalate privileges. Understanding privilege escalation attacks is key to preventing them.
Extensive use of takeown.exe
and icacls.exe
to take ownership and modify permissions on files and directories, particularly targeting backup-related files to hinder recovery.
Lateral movement is achieved using RDP, SMB protocols, and tools deployed via Cobalt Strike.
Defense Evasion:
Safe Mode Boot: Forcing the system into Safe Mode hinders security software and simplifies encryption.
LOLBins: Using native Windows tools (rundll32.exe
, bcdedit.exe
, takeown.exe
, icacls.exe
, powershell.exe
, Windows Command Shell) makes malicious activity harder to distinguish from legitimate administration.
Disabling Security Tools: Attempts to modify Windows Defender settings via registry changes.
Code Obfuscation: Internal strings within the malware are encrypted using RSA-2048, AES-256, and RC4.
Backup Deletion: While some analyses didn't observe automatic shadow copy deletion by the ransomware binary itself, operators typically perform this manually using vssadmin
or other tools before deploying the final payload. They also target backup files directly using takeown
/icacls
.
Exfiltration & Impact:
Data Theft: Significant volumes of sensitive data are exfiltrated before encryption, often using legitimate cloud storage services or C2 channels via encrypted HTTPS.
Encryption: Employs a strong combination of RSA-2048 and AES-256 algorithms to encrypt victim files. Encrypted files are typically appended with a specific extension.
Ransom Note & Leak Site: A ransom note (!!!READ_ME!!!.txt
) is dropped, directing victims to a Tor-based portal (nearly identical to DoppelPaymer's) for payment instructions and negotiation. The site features a "shaming" list where victim data is leaked if the ransom isn't paid. Grief demands payment in Monero (XMR).
Pressure Tactics: Grief operators have threatened to delete decryption keys if victims engage third-party negotiation firms and leverage GDPR references on their leak site to increase pressure. They may also engage in phishing to further compromise victims.
TTP Summary Table (MITRE ATT&CK Mapping):
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1595.001
|
Active Scanning: Scanning IP Blocks
|
Scanning for open RDP ports (3389).
|
T1598
|
Phishing for Information
|
Initial phishing attempts to gather credentials or assess targets.
|
T1593
|
Search Open Websites/Domains
|
Gathering information about target organizations.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1566
|
Phishing
|
Using emails with malicious attachments/links.
|
T1566.001
|
Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment
|
Delivering initial payloads (e.g., SmokeLoader) via email attachments.
|
T1078
|
Valid Accounts
|
Using compromised RDP or domain credentials.
|
T1133
|
External Remote Services
|
Exploiting exposed RDP services.
|
T1110
|
Brute Force
|
Cracking weak RDP passwords.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1059.001
|
Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell
|
Executing commands and scripts.
|
T1059.003
|
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell
|
Executing commands, deploying tools, commands like
bcdedit , takeown , icacls . |
T1047
|
Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI)
|
Used for execution, discovery, and deleting shadow copies.
|
T1106
|
Native API
|
Interacting directly with the Windows OS for various functions (privilege escalation, process injection).
|
T1204.002
|
User Execution: Malicious File
|
User clicks on malicious attachment, initiating infection chain (e.g., SmokeLoader).
|
T1569.002
|
System Services: Service Execution
|
Malicious payload executed via a compromised service.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1547.001
|
Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder
|
Placing malware or links in startup locations for persistence, also used for ransom note display.
|
T1219
|
Remote Access Software
|
Installing tools like AnyDesk for persistent access.
|
T1543.003
|
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service
|
Modifying
ImagePath of a legitimate service for persistence. |
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1134.001
|
Access Token Manipulation: Token Impersonation/Theft
|
Stealing tokens to escalate privileges.
|
T1134.002
|
Access Token Manipulation: Create Process with Token
|
Using stolen tokens (e.g., with SeDebugPrivilege) to run processes with higher privileges.
|
T1055
|
Process Injection
|
Injecting malicious code into legitimate processes (e.g., by SmokeLoader).
|
T1078
|
Valid Accounts
|
Exploiting privileged accounts.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1562.001
|
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools
|
Terminating AV/EDR processes, tampering with Windows Defender, deleting backups/shadow copies.
|
T1562.004
|
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify System Firewall
|
Using
netsh to disable the Windows firewall. |
T1562.009
|
Impair Defenses: Safe Mode Boot
|
Booting into Safe Mode to bypass security tools.
|
T1490
|
Inhibit System Recovery
|
Deleting Volume Shadow Copies using
vssadmin or WMI. |
T1055
|
Process Injection
|
Used by Cobalt Strike precursor.
|
T1112
|
Modify Registry
|
Modifying boot options, service paths, legal notices, potentially Defender settings.
|
T1218.011
|
System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32
|
Used to execute malicious DLLs (Grief payload).
|
T1484.001
|
Group Policy Modification
|
Potential method for disabling security controls.
|
T1574.001
|
Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Search Order Hijacking
|
Used by Dridex precursor.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1003
|
OS Credential Dumping
|
Likely used during reconnaissance/lateral movement phase.
|
T1003.001
|
OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory
|
Using Mimikatz to extract credentials from LSASS.
|
T1003.005
|
OS Credential Dumping: Cached Domain Credentials
|
Accessing cached password hashes.
|
T1555.003
|
Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers
|
Using tools like Remote Desktop Passview to steal stored credentials.
|
T1555.005
|
Credentials from Password Stores: Password Database
|
Specifically targeting password manager databases.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1087.002
|
Account Discovery: Domain Account
|
Enumerating AD users and groups using Bloodhound/Sharphound.
|
T1082
|
System Information Discovery
|
Gathering OS and hardware details.
|
T1057
|
Process Discovery
|
Identifying running processes (e.g., security tools to disable).
|
T1083
|
File and Directory Discovery
|
Searching for valuable data to encrypt/exfiltrate, identifying backup locations.
|
T1135
|
Network Share Discovery
|
Finding accessible network drives for encryption/lateral movement.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1021.001
|
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol
|
Moving between systems using compromised credentials via RDP.
|
T1021.002
|
Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares
|
Potentially used with frameworks like Cobalt Strike.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1560
|
Archive Collected Data
|
Compressing stolen data into archives (e.g., .zip, .rar).
|
T1119
|
Automated Collection
|
Scripts likely used to gather specific file types.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1071
|
Application Layer Protocol
|
Using standard protocols (e.g., HTTPS) for C2. Cobalt Strike uses its own C2 methods.
|
T1071.002
|
Application Layer Protocol: File Transfer Protocols
|
Using FTP (via tools like WinSCP) for exfiltration.
|
T1105
|
Ingress Tool Transfer
|
Downloading additional tools (Cobalt Strike, Mimikatz, Grief payload, etc.) post-compromise.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1041
|
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel
|
Exfiltrating data via C2 infrastructure.
|
T1048
|
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol
|
Using non-standard ports or protocols if primary C2 is blocked.
|
T1567.002
|
Exfiltration to Cloud Storage
|
Uploading stolen data to services like Mega.io.
|
Technique ID
|
Technique Name
|
Description
|
---|---|---|
T1486
|
Data Encrypted for Impact
|
Encrypting files on local and network drives using AES/RSA.
|
T1490
|
Inhibit System Recovery
|
Deleting shadow copies, backups, disabling recovery options.
|
T1657
|
Financial Cryptography Extortion
|
Demanding ransom payment via ransom notes, email, TOR sites, potentially voice calls.
|
Grief ransomware operations are primarily driven by financial gain. The group employs double extortion to maximize the pressure on victims to pay substantial ransoms, often demanded in Monero (XMR) for increased anonymity. While financial motives are paramount, the suspected links to the sanctioned Russian group Evil Corp and the targeting of entities in Western nations occasionally fuel speculation about secondary geopolitical objectives, although concrete evidence for this remains limited. The potential risks of using cryptocurrencies like Monero in ransomware attacks should be noted.
The potential impact of a Grief attack is severe, extending beyond mere data encryption. Victims face:
Data Breach: Exfiltration of sensitive corporate, customer, or employee data, leading to regulatory fines (e.g., GDPR), legal action, and reputational damage. Data breaches can have long-lasting consequences.
Operational Disruption: Encryption of critical systems can halt business operations for extended periods, causing significant revenue loss and recovery costs.
Financial Loss: Costs include ransom payments (if made), incident response, system restoration, legal fees, and potential regulatory penalties.
Grief exhibits a broad target spectrum, though certain sectors appear more frequently on their leak site. Targeted industries include:
Healthcare
Financial Services
Government (including municipalities)
Education (including school districts)
Manufacturing
Technology
Entertainment
While large enterprises and high-value organizations seem to be preferred targets due to their perceived ability to pay larger ransoms, smaller and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) are not immune. Geographically, Grief operates globally, but a significant number of victims have been reported in North America and Europe.
Since its emergence in mid-2021, Grief has been linked to numerous disruptive attacks. Some notable examples include:
National Rifle Association (NRA) Attack (October-November 2021): This high-profile incident demonstrated Grief's capabilities and willingness to target prominent organizations. Around October 27, 2021, Grief listed the NRA on its leak site, initially releasing a small subset of documents (meeting minutes, grant applications). After briefly removing the listing (potentially during negotiations or due to unwanted attention), Grief released a larger trove of sensitive data around November 10, allegedly including employee PII like bank details and Social Security numbers. The NRA remained largely silent, neither confirming the breach nor stating if a ransom was paid, drawing criticism. The attack highlighted the complexities involved, including the need for Treasury Department approval if the NRA had chosen to pay, due to Grief's suspected link to the sanctioned Evil Corp.
Attack on Thessaloniki, Greece (Late 2021): Grief targeted the municipality of Thessaloniki, the second-largest city in Greece, causing significant disruption to public services. This attack underscored the group's willingness to impact governmental entities.
Attack on German Government District (Late 2021): Reports indicated Grief successfully targeted a major government district in Germany, further demonstrating their focus on high-value public sector targets.
Multiple Manufacturing and Service Companies: Throughout its operation, Grief has listed numerous victims from the manufacturing, technology, and professional services sectors on its leak site, showcasing its broad reach across various industries. Recent reports have indicated that supply chain attacks are becoming increasingly common.
These campaigns illustrate Grief's consistent use of double extortion, targeting organizations across diverse sectors and regions, often causing significant operational and reputational damage.
Defending against sophisticated threats like Grief ransomware requires a multi-layered, defense-in-depth strategy focusing on prevention, detection, and response. Given Grief's reliance on precursors like Dridex and Cobalt Strike, and its use of LOLBins, behavioral detection and proactive hardening are critical.
Prevention:
Security Awareness Training: Educate employees to recognize and report phishing attempts, suspicious attachments, and links. Companies are implementing phishing simulations to better train employees.
Email Security: Implement robust email filtering solutions to block malicious emails, attachments, and URLs.
Patch Management: Maintain a rigorous patch management program to address vulnerabilities in operating systems, applications (especially public-facing ones), and firmware promptly. A comprehensive patch management strategy is essential for mitigating risks.
Access Control: Enforce the principle of least privilege. Use strong, unique passwords for all accounts and mandate Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), especially for remote access (RDP, VPN) and privileged accounts.
RDP Hardening: Secure RDP access by using strong passwords, MFA, Network Level Authentication (NLA), limiting access via firewalls, and using VPNs. Disable RDP if not required.
Network Segmentation: Segment networks to limit the blast radius if an infection occurs, preventing easy lateral movement.
Disable Unused Services: Reduce the attack surface by disabling unnecessary protocols and services.
Detection:
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR/XDR): Deploy advanced EDR/XDR solutions capable of behavioral analysis to detect suspicious activities associated with Grief's TTPs, such as:
Execution of system binaries (msinfo32.exe
, dialer.exe
) from non-standard paths (e.g., %APPDATA%
).
Processes like svchost.exe
running without command-line arguments and making external network connections (Cobalt Strike indicator).
Suspicious use of rundll32.exe
(especially with DllRegisterServer
).
Anomalous use of bcdedit.exe
, takeown.exe
, icacls.exe
, and vssadmin.exe
.
Attempts to modify sensitive registry keys or disable security tools.
Network Monitoring: Monitor network traffic for unusual patterns, C2 communications (Cobalt Strike beacons often have specific patterns), large data exfiltration attempts, and connections to known malicious IPs or domains.
Log Management & SIEM: Collect and analyze logs from endpoints, servers, and network devices. Use a SIEM to correlate events and alert on suspicious sequences indicative of Grief activity (e.g., Dridex indicators followed by Cobalt Strike, then file permission changes). Understanding security logging and monitoring can improve detection capabilities.
Regular Audits: Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate weaknesses. A strong vulnerability assessment strategy is key.
Response & Recovery:
Incident Response Plan: Develop and regularly test a comprehensive incident response plan. It is important to know why you need a CIRP and how to implement it.
Backup and Disaster Recovery (BDR): Implement a robust BDR strategy:
Perform regular backups of critical data (follow the 3-2-1 rule: 3 copies, 2 different media, 1 offsite/offline/immutable).
Ensure backups are stored offline or in immutable storage, protected from ransomware encryption.
Regularly test backup restoration procedures to ensure they work effectively.
Isolation: Quickly isolate infected systems from the network to prevent further spread.
Ransom Payment Considerations: Avoid paying the ransom if possible. Payment fuels the ransomware ecosystem, does not guarantee data recovery or prevent data leaks, and may involve legal risks (especially with sanctioned groups like Evil Corp). Consult legal counsel and law enforcement.
Grief ransomware stands as a significant and persistent threat in the cybercrime landscape, notable for its strong ties to the DoppelPaymer ransomware family and suspected affiliation with the Russian Evil Corp group. Emerging in mid-2021 likely as a strategic rebrand, Grief leverages sophisticated TTPs, often involving precursor malware like Dridex and post-exploitation frameworks like Cobalt Strike, alongside extensive use of legitimate system tools for evasion. Its double-extortion model, targeting diverse sectors globally, results in severe operational disruption and data breaches. Defending against Grief requires a robust, layered security posture emphasizing proactive prevention, advanced behavioral detection capabilities, strict access controls, rigorous patch management, and critically, resilient and regularly tested offline backup strategies. Continuous vigilance and adaptation are key to mitigating the risks posed by this evolving ransomware threat. The use of SIEM can aid in the continuous monitoring necessary to detect and respond to such threats effectively.
Found this article interesting? Keep visit thesecmaster.com, and our social media page on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Telegram, Tumblr, Medium, and Instagram and subscribe to receive tips like this.
You may also like these articles:
Arun KL is a cybersecurity professional with 15+ years of experience in IT infrastructure, cloud security, vulnerability management, Penetration Testing, security operations, and incident response. He is adept at designing and implementing robust security solutions to safeguard systems and data. Arun holds multiple industry certifications including CCNA, CCNA Security, RHCE, CEH, and AWS Security.
“Knowledge Arsenal: Empowering Your Security Journey through Continuous Learning”
"Cybersecurity All-in-One For Dummies" offers a comprehensive guide to securing personal and business digital assets from cyber threats, with actionable insights from industry experts.
BurpGPT is a cutting-edge Burp Suite extension that harnesses the power of OpenAI's language models to revolutionize web application security testing. With customizable prompts and advanced AI capabilities, BurpGPT enables security professionals to uncover bespoke vulnerabilities, streamline assessments, and stay ahead of evolving threats.
PentestGPT, developed by Gelei Deng and team, revolutionizes penetration testing by harnessing AI power. Leveraging OpenAI's GPT-4, it automates and streamlines the process, making it efficient and accessible. With advanced features and interactive guidance, PentestGPT empowers testers to identify vulnerabilities effectively, representing a significant leap in cybersecurity.
Tenable BurpGPT is a powerful Burp Suite extension that leverages OpenAI's advanced language models to analyze HTTP traffic and identify potential security risks. By automating vulnerability detection and providing AI-generated insights, BurpGPT dramatically reduces manual testing efforts for security researchers, developers, and pentesters.
Microsoft Security Copilot is a revolutionary AI-powered security solution that empowers cybersecurity professionals to identify and address potential breaches effectively. By harnessing advanced technologies like OpenAI's GPT-4 and Microsoft's extensive threat intelligence, Security Copilot streamlines threat detection and response, enabling defenders to operate at machine speed and scale.