Table of Contents
Patchwork APT, also known as Dropping Elephant, Chinastrats, Monsoon, Sarit, Quilted Tiger, APT-C-09, and ZINC EMERSON, is a persistent cyberespionage group believed to be operating since at least 2009. While not considered among the most technically sophisticated APT groups, Patchwork has demonstrated a consistent ability to adapt and evolve its tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) to achieve its objectives. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of Patchwork APT, covering its origins, evolution, TTPs, target victimology, attack campaigns, and defensive strategies. The primary focus will be on recent campaigns and newly observed techniques, incorporating information from multiple security research sources. It's crucial to implement a robust patch management strategy to defend against such threats.
Origins & Evolution
Patchwork APT was first publicly identified in December 2015, although evidence suggests its activities date back to at least 2009. The group is believed to be India-based, although definitive attribution remains challenging in the realm of cyberespionage. This suspected origin is supported by the group's consistent targeting of entities involved in diplomatic and economic relations, particularly those with ties to China and Pakistan.
Over the years, Patchwork has shown an iterative approach to its operations. Initially, the group relied heavily on readily available, open-source tools and exploits. However, they have gradually incorporated more custom-developed malware and refined their techniques. This evolution includes:
Shifting Malware Arsenal: From early reliance on BADNEWS RAT to the more recent adoption of custom backdoors like "Nexe" and the Android-focused VajraSpy RAT.
Improved Operational Security: Patchwork has demonstrated efforts to improve its operational security, although occasional lapses (such as self-infection incidents) have provided valuable insights for researchers.
Expanding Target Scope: While maintaining a core focus on South and Southeast Asia, Patchwork's targeting has expanded to include organizations in Europe and North America, and even China itself.
Exploiting Known Vulnerabilities: The group has shown resourcefulness by utilizing vulnerabilities like CVE-2017-0261, CVE-2017-8570, and others.
This constant evolution makes understanding Patchwork's current TTPs crucial for effective defense. Threat intelligence is very helpful in this regard.
Tactics & Techniques
Patchwork APT employs a range of tactics across the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Their operations typically follow these key stages:
Initial Access:
* Spearphishing (T1566.001, T1566.002): Patchwork's primary infection vector is spearphishing, using both attachments and links. Emails are often carefully crafted, impersonating legitimate organizations or individuals, and leveraging themes relevant to the target (e.g., geopolitical issues, defense, research). They actively use "web bugs" (embedded image tags) to track which recipients open their phishing emails (T1598.003). Understanding types of phishing attacks can help to prevent them.
* Drive-by Compromise (T1189): Patchwork has also utilized watering hole attacks, compromising websites frequented by their targets to deliver malicious payloads.
Execution:
* User Execution (T1204): Reliance on the user opening a malicious attachment or clicking a malicious link.
* PowerShell (T1059.001): Frequently utilized for downloading additional payloads and executing commands.
Persistence:
* Scheduled Tasks/Jobs (T1053.005): Patchwork frequently creates scheduled tasks to ensure its malware remains active on the compromised system.
* Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder (T1547.001): Placing payloads in startup folders or creating registry run keys is another common persistence technique. More about Windows registry structure.
* BITS Jobs (T1197): Utilizing the Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) for downloading malicious payloads.
* Masquerading (T1036.005): Disguising payloads with legitimate software names (e.g., "Baidu Software Update," "Net Monitor") to avoid detection. They are known for renaming QuasarRAT binaries.
Privilege Escalation:
* DLL Side-Loading (T1574.002): Using legitimate applications, they sideload malicious libraries.
* Process Injection (T1055.012): Employing techniques like process hollowing to hide malicious code within legitimate processes (e.g., svchost.exe). A privilege escalation attack could be used.
Defense Evasion:
* Masquerading (T1036): As mentioned above, disguising malware as legitimate software.
* Modify Registry (T1112): Deleting Office Resiliency Registry keys to mask application issues caused by exploits.
* Process Injection (T1055): Hiding malicious code within legitimate processes.
* Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027): Use obfuscation and/or encryption to hide collected data.
* Impair Defenses (T1562): Recent campaigns have shown sophisticated techniques to disable security mechanisms like AMSI and ETW by patching relevant APIs in memory.
Discovery:
* System Information Discovery (T1082): Gathering information about the compromised system, including OS version, architecture, computer name, and drive enumeration.
* System Owner/User Discovery (T1033): Collecting username and administrator status.
* File and Directory Discovery (T1083): Searching for specific file types and extensions on fixed drives.
Collection:
* Automated Collection (T1119): Using file stealers to automatically search for and collect files matching specific criteria.
* Input Capture (T1056): Keylogging functionalities have been observed in several Patchwork payloads, including Ragnatela and VajraSpy.
* Screen Capture (T1113): Ragnatela was observed to have screenshot capture.
* Archive Collected Data (T1560): Encrypting and encoding collected data (e.g., using AES and Base64).
Command and Control:
* Application Layer Protocol (T1071): Using standard protocols like HTTP and HTTPS for communication with C&C servers.
* Web Service (T1102): The group is known for leveraging legitimate online services like Firebase.
- Exfiltration:
* Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041): Exfiltrating collected data through the established C&C channel.
Targets or Victimology
Patchwork APT's targeting demonstrates a clear geopolitical focus. Their primary targets include:
Government and Diplomatic Entities: Embassies, foreign ministries, and other government organizations involved in international relations, particularly those with ties to China, Pakistan, and other South Asian countries.
Defense Contractors and Research Institutions: Organizations involved in defense research and development, aerospace technology, and related fields.
Think Tanks: Organizations conducting research and analysis on geopolitical issues, particularly those related to China's foreign policy. This includes US-based think tanks.
Academic Institutions: Universities and research centers, particularly those with departments focused on molecular medicine, biological sciences, and related fields (a more recent shift in targeting).
Businesses (Expanding Target Scope): While historically focused on espionage, Patchwork has also targeted businesses, including B2C online retailers, telecommunications and media companies, and financial institutions.
Mobile Users: Primarily Pakistani users are targetted through Honey-trap romance scams.
Targeted Regions:
South and Southeast Asia: Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and other countries in the region.
China: Patchwork has been observed targeting organizations within China, adding complexity to the attribution puzzle.
Europe and North America: Expanding its reach to include organizations in the UK, the US, and other Western countries.
Bhutan: Organizations were found to be targeted by the group.
The shift towards targeting researchers in molecular medicine and biological sciences suggests a potential interest in acquiring intellectual property or sensitive research data. Securing IoT devices are also important.
Attack Campaigns
Several notable attack campaigns have been attributed to Patchwork APT:
2017-2018: Targeting US Think Tanks: Spearphishing campaigns impersonating well-known think tanks (CFR, CSIS, MERICS) to deliver QuasarRAT via CVE-2017-8570 exploitation. This campaign demonstrated the use of email tracking to identify targets.
Late 2021: Ragnatela RAT Campaign: Targeting Pakistani entities, including the Ministry of Defense and universities, using malicious RTF files and the Ragnatela RAT. This campaign is notable for the threat actor inadvertently infecting their own development machine, providing researchers with valuable insights.
2021-2022: VajraSpy Android Campaign: Distribution of the VajraSpy Android RAT through malicious apps, primarily targeting Pakistani users via honey-trap romance scams. This campaign demonstrated Patchwork's expansion into the mobile threat landscape.
2024- "Nexe" Backdoor Campaign : Observed since July 2024, it involved malicious LNK files to deploy the Nexe Backdoor, featuring AMSI and ETW bypass techniques and data exfiltration to the
iceandfire[.]xyzC&C server. This campaign represents the most recent techniques used by the group. It targeted Chinese entities and Bhutan.January 2021: Targeting China with CVE-2017-0261: A malformed document ("Chinese_Pakistani_fighter_planes_play_war_games.docx") delivered via spearphishing exploited this vulnerability to drop a payload that collected system information and logged keystrokes.
These campaigns highlight Patchwork's consistent use of spearphishing, exploitation of known vulnerabilities, and iterative development of its malware arsenal. Understand more about vulnerability assessments.
Defenses
Defending against Patchwork APT requires a multi-layered security approach, focusing on both prevention and detection:
Email Security: Robust email filtering and security gateways are crucial to block spearphishing attempts. This includes analyzing attachments, URLs, and sender reputation. Sender Policy Framework, DKIM and DMARC are helpful to prevent attacks.
User Awareness Training: Educating users about the dangers of phishing and social engineering is paramount. Users should be trained to recognize suspicious emails, avoid clicking on untrusted links or opening attachments from unknown senders, and report potential phishing attempts.
Vulnerability Management: Promptly patching known vulnerabilities, especially in Microsoft Office, web browsers, and other commonly targeted software, is essential. Virtual patching can be used to mitigate vulnerabilities before official patches are available.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): Deploying EDR solutions on endpoints provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities. EDR can detect malicious behavior, such as process injection, unusual file modifications, and suspicious network connections. Also consider SIEM for security information.
Network Segmentation: Segmenting networks can limit the lateral movement of attackers if they successfully compromise a system.
Least Privilege Access: Enforcing the principle of least privilege, restricting user access to only the resources they need, can limit the damage caused by a successful compromise.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Implementing MFA adds an extra layer of security, making it more difficult for attackers to gain access to accounts even if they obtain credentials. Consider passwordless authentication.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitoring system and network behavior for anomalies can help detect malicious activity. This includes looking for unusual process executions, unexpected network connections, and large data transfers. Consider UEBA for event analysis.
Threat Intelligence: Leveraging threat intelligence feeds and sharing information with industry peers can provide valuable insights into Patchwork's latest TTPs and indicators of compromise (IOCs).
Network and System Hardening: Reduce attack surfaces.
Application Control: Blocking the execution of unauthorized or suspicious applications can prevent malware from running.
Mobile Device Security: Because Patchwork is known to deploy Android malware, having endpoint security on Android is crucial.
Conclusion
Patchwork APT remains an active and evolving threat actor, demonstrating a persistent focus on cyberespionage. While not the most technically advanced group, their ability to adapt, their use of both custom and off-the-shelf tools, and their expanding target scope make them a significant concern. Organizations, particularly those in government, defense, research, and sectors with ties to South Asia and China, should prioritize understanding Patchwork's TTPs and implement robust security measures to defend against their attacks. Continuous monitoring, proactive threat hunting, and information sharing are crucial to stay ahead of this evolving threat. The combination of technical defenses, user education, and proactive threat intelligence is essential for mitigating the risk posed by Patchwork APT.
Found this article interesting? Keep visit thesecmaster.com, and our social media page on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Telegram, Tumblr, Medium, and Instagram and subscribe to receive tips like this.
You may also like these articles:
North Korean Hackers Deploy New OtterCookie Malware Targeting Software Developers
New Android Malware 'DroidBot' Threatens Banking and Crypto Apps Across Europe
Chinese APT Group Earth Estries Targets Critical Infrastructure with Advanced Cyber Attacks
DONOT APT Deploys Malicious Tanzeem Android Apps for Intelligence Gathering
Russian Gamaredon APT Deploys New Android Spyware Targeting Former Soviet States
Arun KL
Arun KL is a cybersecurity professional with 15+ years of experience in IT infrastructure, cloud security, vulnerability management, Penetration Testing, security operations, and incident response. He is adept at designing and implementing robust security solutions to safeguard systems and data. Arun holds multiple industry certifications including CCNA, CCNA Security, RHCE, CEH, and AWS Security.
