Secrets of Prioritizing Incidents

Whenever an alert or incident is reported to security operations or incident response teams, the first task of a security analyst or incident responder is to assess the alert and prioritize it. False assessment and poor prioritization can lead to massive disruptions. Imagine seeing a flood of alerts and incidents before you—it's in these moments that prioritization becomes critical. Without a well-defined prioritization strategy, you're likely to fail in addressing the most important threats. On the other hand, a good prioritization plan can save organizations from catastrophe, ensuring that the most serious risks are dealt with promptly and effectively.

Could you please prioritize these incidents?

Upon reading this article, you will gain the knowledge to prioritize these incidents in a strategic way.

In this article, we'll unlock the secrets of incident prioritization for security analysts and incident responders. We'll dive into the most critical methodologies used for assessing and prioritizing incidents, based on three main factors- functional impact, information impact, and recoverability effort. We'll also explore best practices and real-world examples of how to streamline the response process.

Why Prioritizing Incidents is Crucial

Every organization, from small startups to large enterprises, is vulnerable to a range of cybersecurity incidents. The challenge is deciding which incidents to address first when they all demand immediate attention. Not every alert or suspicious activity carries the same risk, but missing a high-priority incident could result in severe consequences. That's why effective incident prioritization is necessary—it helps optimize the allocation of resources, ensuring that critical threats are handled before they can do significant damage.

Many organizations experience hundreds or even thousands of security alerts daily. Incident handlers must evaluate, classify, and prioritize each one, categorizing it as benign, suspicious, or malicious. Once classified, incidents must be further ranked based on their potential impact to the business. Let's explore the various methods of categorizing and prioritizing incidents.

Functional Impact: The First Layer of Prioritization

The first step in prioritizing incidents is evaluating their functional impact on the organization. This method focuses on how the incident affects the company's daily operations. Depending on the industry, an incident affecting one critical service can have devastating consequences, while another may be manageable with minimal disruption.

Functional Impact Categories

By understanding how an incident impacts the business, analysts can prioritize incidents that directly threaten the company's ability to operate. This approach is a key part of an effective Cyber Incident Response Plan.

Information Impact: Assessing Data Breaches and Confidentiality

When classifying incidents, analysts must also consider the information impact—the degree to which the incident affects the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the organization's data. For industries that manage sensitive data, such as healthcare or finance, information impact can often outweigh functional impact.

Types of Information Impact

Organizations that prioritize based on information impact are particularly concerned with maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of their data. This becomes crucial in industries where trust is paramount, such as financial services and healthcare. Understanding these impacts is a key part of implementing an effective Cyber Incident Response Plan.

Recoverability Effort: Understanding the Scope and Scale of Recovery

The next layer of prioritization focuses on the recoverability effort—how difficult and time-consuming it will be to recover from the incident. According to the  NIST Special Publication 800-61, organizations categorize recovery into four levels:

By evaluating the recoverability effort, incident responders can better prioritize incidents based on the resources required to restore normal operations. Incidents that are deemed unrecoverable or require extensive time and effort to resolve are often escalated in priority.

Combining Prioritization Factors for a Holistic Approach

Organizations rarely rely on just one method of prioritization. In most cases, functional impact, information impact, and recoverability effort are combined to create a more comprehensive view of the incident's severity. Some organizations even assign a weighted score to each of these factors to calculate an overall priority ranking for each incident.

By combining these factors, incident responders can ensure they are focusing their efforts on the incidents that pose the greatest risk to the organization. This approach is crucial for effective incident response.

Example Scenario

Consider an organization that experiences three different incidents on the same day:

Conclusion

In today's fast-paced cybersecurity landscape, security analysts and incident responders need to prioritize incidents quickly and efficiently. Focusing on functional impact, information impact, and recoverability effort allows teams to manage incidents with precision, ensuring the most critical threats are addressed first.

By following best practices such as creating incident response playbooks, leveraging automation, and continuously reviewing procedures, organizations can enhance their incident prioritization process, protecting themselves from the most significant cybersecurity threats.

Implementing these strategies ensures that your security team can respond to the growing number of incidents with confidence and clarity, minimizing the risk to the business and maximizing operational resilience.

We hope this article helps you learn about prioritizing incidents. Visit our website, thesecmaster.com, and our social media page on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Telegram, Tumblr, Medium, and Instagram and subscribe to receive tips like this.  

You may also like these articles: