Developing secure applications requires more than just coding practices. It needs a holistic approach that centers around secure design principles.
Insecure design issues can lead to vulnerabilities that span all categories of risks like the OWASP Top 10. As the OWASP mentions, insecure design has the potential to impact all the top 10 application security risks identified by OWASP.
CWEs Mapped | 40 |
Max Incidence Rate | 24.19% |
Avg Incidence Rate | 3.00% |
Avg Weighted Exploit | 6.46 |
Avg Weighted Impact | 6.78 |
Max Coverage | 77.25% |
Avg Coverage | 42.51% |
Total Occurrences | 262,407 |
Total CVEs | 2,691 |
A04:2021 – Insecure Design
Insecure design refers to flaws in the initial architecture, specifications, and layout of an application’s functionality. Unlike coding bugs that can be fixed, design flaws cannot be coded out later.
Some examples of insecure design patterns highlighted in the text include:
Using weak authentication methods like security questions, which can be easily guessed through public information
Not restricting file uploads adequately or validating uploaded file types
Returning overly detailed error messages that reveal sensitive information
The impact of insecure design can be massive. The text cites over 2,600 Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) related to design flaws with high exploit and impact scores.
Vulnerabilities that can arise due to improper design span things like:
Information leakage through verbose error reporting
Allowing arbitrary code execution via unrestricted file uploads
Enabling injection attacks with unsanitized user inputs
Ultimately, design issues weaken the application’s overall security posture significantly.
The key takeaway from the text is that we need to shift left and prioritize secure design in the application development lifecycle.
Here are some recommendations highlighted to promote secure design:
Adopting a secure software development lifecycle (SDLC)
Performing threat modeling during design phase
Using secure coding best practices and automated testing
Enabling continuous security validation through tools
The text specifically calls out OWASP’s secure SDLC methodology spanning five stages:
Planning: Define goals, requirements, scope
Design: Create architecture, threat model
Development: Code, code review, test coverage
Testing: Validate functionality, security
Release: Deploy, monitor, respond
In each stage, OWASP provides guidance, tools, and frameworks like the Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM) to embed security by design.
In summary, the text reiterates that applications built without integrating secure design practices are set up to fail. Security issues should be mitigated proactively through measures woven into the fabric of the development lifecycle, not as an afterthought.
Shifting left into secure design is key to building robust, secure applications.
What are your thoughts on addressing application security through ingraining secure design? Feel free to share other ideas or recommendations in the comments.
We hope this post helped in learning about OWASP Top #4 application security risk Insecure Design. Thanks for reading this post. Please share this post and help secure the digital world. Visit our website, thesecmaster.com, and our social media page on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Telegram, Tumblr, Medium, and Instagram and subscribe to receive updates like this.
You may also like these articles:
Rajeshwari KA is a Software Architect who has worked on full-stack development, Software Design, and Architecture for small and large-scale mission-critical applications in her 18 + years of experience.
“Knowledge Arsenal: Empowering Your Security Journey through Continuous Learning”
"Cybersecurity All-in-One For Dummies" offers a comprehensive guide to securing personal and business digital assets from cyber threats, with actionable insights from industry experts.
BurpGPT is a cutting-edge Burp Suite extension that harnesses the power of OpenAI's language models to revolutionize web application security testing. With customizable prompts and advanced AI capabilities, BurpGPT enables security professionals to uncover bespoke vulnerabilities, streamline assessments, and stay ahead of evolving threats.
PentestGPT, developed by Gelei Deng and team, revolutionizes penetration testing by harnessing AI power. Leveraging OpenAI's GPT-4, it automates and streamlines the process, making it efficient and accessible. With advanced features and interactive guidance, PentestGPT empowers testers to identify vulnerabilities effectively, representing a significant leap in cybersecurity.
Tenable BurpGPT is a powerful Burp Suite extension that leverages OpenAI's advanced language models to analyze HTTP traffic and identify potential security risks. By automating vulnerability detection and providing AI-generated insights, BurpGPT dramatically reduces manual testing efforts for security researchers, developers, and pentesters.
Microsoft Security Copilot is a revolutionary AI-powered security solution that empowers cybersecurity professionals to identify and address potential breaches effectively. By harnessing advanced technologies like OpenAI's GPT-4 and Microsoft's extensive threat intelligence, Security Copilot streamlines threat detection and response, enabling defenders to operate at machine speed and scale.